Animations and Simulations

NHC Science animations probably would have been good. The link didn’t work and I don’t know if my google search provided the right page… seemed to be, but I wasn’t going to download the plug-ins to make the animations work.

Dissect a frog was interesting, if the voice wasn’t ridiculously digital, it might have been worth watching all of it. I’m sure the rest would have gotten better, with more interaction which seemed to be going down the right path, asking questions and getting the student to click and then giving descriptions. Good approach.

The Gizmos was very similar to a program we had the students use in undergrad Physics, ‘Mastering Physics’. I think the Gizmos are great. Fantastic, especially in a teaching package. Subscription fees and issues seemed to be the biggest problems we had. Should the students have to buy it? Should it be provided? Another problem that was never looked into was that students would be getting 95% or better in the embedded assessment, but over half the class still failed the exam. How good a teaching aide was it really? There was no transfer to problems outside the system. This would have to be used with care. I still think it is excellent and quite unparalleled for distance and online learning. Just perhaps not by itself.

Image Manipulation

Good for it. You don’t need online technologies to do this. In fact, after my previous post, I would suggest not doing so. Yes, fancy image manipulation tools are expensive, but Microsoft picture editor is easy, simple, and comes with Office, so no extra cost. Mac has ColorSync Utility for resizing. Publisher is great for adding text, lines, circles… cropping, merging photos… and saves in several file types. So I’ll stick to those for now. Anything else, I’d want to be running a multimedia course to bother about.

Flickr

I am familiar with Flickr as my friends use it and I think I might have used it once. I can’t see particular relevance to teaching, except perhaps getting the students to take photos of something and put them up? We did this when I was at Purdue University. For research into primary school teachers’ understanding of what engineering was. We did pre and post intervention photos and they wrote a little about each photo. Flickr could be used to collate the photos.

I just tried to log into Flickr. I thought it would be easy since it takes a Google id and I had one of those. Then it asked for me to put in all my details. I was partially through that when it asked for a screen name. I tried Gemma, but that was already in use. I thought, here we go! So 6 tries later with strange combinations, I got so frustrated I had to shut down the computer and walk away!

This seems to be quite a trend with these technologies. They are SOOOO much more frustrating than I could ever have imagined and that is very depressing. While some of them would be good in my course, or other courses, until they become user friendly, I’m not touching them with a 10 foot pole!

Video

Videos are great. In this day and age, a simple video blog from the lecturer can promote engagement. Videos of document cameras are really good too, especially in my area where verbal and textural communication is just not enough. Drawing diagrams and solving problems on paper with a pen right in front of the students’ eyes is just the best. I have used that so many times in my course. I just wish there was an easier way to do it from my home office, since I lecture casually and have a full-time day job. At the moment I use the doc camera in the ISL room and can flip to lecture cam easily too. I almost want a movable desk camera that I can turn to me, put on the paper or show small experiments with. Wow, there is just nothing that will meet having the students standing there with you is there? Virtual reality, here we come!

PowerPoint

This tutorial could be helpful if you have no idea about powerpoint. If you have some idea, it would be hard to just find the bits you don’t know about. The formatting was very painful in a thin column on one side and a lot of scrolling. This could be avoided.

There is a lot of information in there – so comprehensive indeed. If you were using that as a tool in a guided way to help your students learn powerpoint it would be good. On its own, perhaps a bit overwhelming. Not very interactive either. Yes, there are quizzes, but it should be used in conjunction with activities designed to have a practice at using powerpoint.

It is a bit condescending with the people and the words. Maybe a story is helpful for engaging?? but it could also be a turn off. There is no quick way though it. Wow, and the more I go through it, the more insanely boring it gets!

OK, so I get the point of a tutorial – start from the beginning and cover everything. But now I know what not to do!

Pontydysgu

My first impression was ‘holy crap what a jumble of stuff!’

I did look through some of it. This time there is a landing page, although a crazy one with no explanation of what is what. It looks like an interesting collaborative space and there seem to be great projects going on. It would, however, take some doing to trawl through it and find what you want. Then I guess RSS would be a good idea!

I’m not sure of the point of this particular page, but it does give the idea that this might be useful for a class as a class project. Create this page where there are different group projects where all participants can contribute and do so in different media – photos, text, videos. Perhaps a tad more interesting, if not confusing, than a standard group project? Also more creative and available to the whole class and afterwards the whole world as a consolidation of learning than a typical wiki? Might need a fair bit of facilitation with techno-novices as students, so might work better in a course focussing on technology, and would still need to be clear and easy to use. I could, potentially, see students setting up this page with different people responsible to different tasks in different weeks, such as the news bites – all members of group 1 have to contribute a news bite in week 1, a personal blog in week 2, a critique of an article in week 3, etc. This would all be in a consistent format but end up creating a fabulous resource.

elearningspace blog

This is an interesting approach. It puts all of the learning into a blog by the lecturer. I guess that is good since it means that the lecturer is engaged, HAS to be engaged to some extent to keep blogging (or copying and pasting) and that probably does create a rapport with the students, especially if they are blogging too.

On the other hand, I went to the blog and was a bit confused as an outsider looking in. That would probably not be the case for new students who start at the beginning, except for students who start late. There is no “landing page” with information about what to do, where to find help… all the things we like on our Moodle sites.

Oh, and talk about the scroll of death :)